Promise VTrak M500f/Support Case Log: Difference between revisions

From fakedWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 222: Line 222:
Now you're more specific. We could more constructive dialog from the beginning. I will need to perform some tests and I will contact you again with the results.
Now you're more specific. We could more constructive dialog from the beginning. I will need to perform some tests and I will contact you again with the results.


As for information that you ask, I could not provide it to you now because this information is confidential.
As for information that you ask, I could not provide it to you now because this information is confidential.|Response By:- Sergiy Voskoboynikov |5th August 2011 at 3:14}}


Request:-  5th August 2011 at 3:30
{{Quote|Well, we could have gotten there a lot faster and easier if you wouldn't have tried to convince me that this is because of faulty hardware - which i pointed out to you multiple times by telling you to read my previous messages.
{{Quote|Well, we could have gotten there a lot faster and easier if you wouldn't have tried to convince me that this is because of faulty hardware - which i pointed out to you multiple times by telling you to read my previous messages.


Line 230: Line 229:
Now if i wouldn't have to find out myself how to get them, but just get them, there's nothing i could publish, right?
Now if i wouldn't have to find out myself how to get them, but just get them, there's nothing i could publish, right?


On a sidenote, where do you provide the sourcecode for your firmware? As you're using GPL licensed code, you MUST release the corresponding source code, in case you didn't know... a good starting point: http://gpl-violations.org/faq/vendor-faq.html|Response By:- Sergiy Voskoboynikov |5th August 2011 at 3:14}}
On a sidenote, where do you provide the sourcecode for your firmware? As you're using GPL licensed code, you MUST release the corresponding source code, in case you didn't know... a good starting point: http://gpl-violations.org/faq/vendor-faq.html|Request:- |5th August 2011 at 3:30}}

Revision as of 13:26, 5 August 2011